Legal Opinion

McClure v. Clarke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1904No. Nos. 14,200—(133)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Stearns county, Baxter, J., opening a judgment by default as to defendant Caroline E. Clarke and permitting her to answer and defend.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court of Stearns county relieving the defendant Caroline E. Clarke from default therein and allowing her to answer.

This was an action to quiet title, and summons.was served upon said defendant personally January 30, 1902. An order for judgment *38was duly made against her on December 31 following, but the entry thereof was deferred until April, 1904. From the affidavit of defendant it appears that shortly after its service she handed the summons to her husband and general agent, Nehemiah P. Clarke, who was also a defendant. An attorney was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People's Ice Co. v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. McMurran v. BourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Osman v. WistedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. White v. GurneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Crane & Ordway Co. v. SauntrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DismangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. National Council of Knights and Ladies of Security v. CanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Foster v. CoughranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API