Osman v. Wisted
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion to open the judgment and for leave to answer.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion, made June 17, 1899, to open, vacate, and set aside a default judgment entered against them on November 20, 1897, and for leave to answer in an action brought to determine adverse claims to real" proper tv in plaintiff’s possession. There are two good reasons for affirming the order:
1. There was no abuse of discretion when the motion was denied on the showing made at the hearing as to the service of the summons and complaint on each of the defendants more than 10 days prior to the entry of judgment. The service was made by a deputy sheriff,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jensen v. CrevierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Kueffner v. GottfriedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Butler Brothers Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Otto v. Charles T. Miller HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.