Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. Oppliger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Roseau county permitting a judgment entered by default against defendant to be opened, and allowing her to make her defense in the same and serve an answer thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
Peb Cueiam.
Suit to recover the price for a bill of goods sold in 1908. Personal service of summons in October, 1912. Judgment by default entered in February following, and in May thereafter defendant applied to have the default opened and for leave to answer. The court permitted the answer but let the judgment, which was a lien on defendant’s real estate, stand to abide the result of a trial. Plaintiff appeals.
The affidavit supporting the application and the proposed answer tend to show a meritorious defense. In December, 1908, suit was brought by plaintiff against defendant and her husband…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People's Ice Co. v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- McMurran v. BourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- John T. Noye Manufacturing Co. v. Wheaton Roller-Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Walsh v. BoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Rodgers v. United States & Dominion Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- In Re Estate of WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Zell v. Friend-Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Hasara v. SwaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.