White v. Gurney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Adeline Gurney from an order of the district court for Sherhurne county, Giddings, J., denying a motion to vacate a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon default of defendants and for leave to answer.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Application by defendants to vacate judgment entered on November 17, 1902, and for permission to answer. From the order of the court •overruling the same, defendant Adeline Gurney appeals.
It appears that on April 14, 1902, H. E. White and the plaintiff, Frank T. White, commenced separate actions against the defendants to ■determine adverse claims to land situated in Sherburne county. The respective complaints were upon similar paper, and signed by the same .attorney. Service upon the defendants was personal, and they delivered the pape.rs to their attorney with the request that he answer and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lord v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- McMurran v. BourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Aldrich v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Marsh v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Milwaukee Harvester Co. v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Rodgers v. United States & Dominion Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BielejeskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- In Re Estate of WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Flanery v. KushaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.