Legal Opinion

Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1903No. Nos. 13,438—(35)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Still-water, .Doe, J.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the municipal court of Stillwater granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside a judgment *302of dismissal of the action taken by default and to reinstate the action for trial.

The order was based upon the records and files in the action and the affidavit of the plaintiff’s attorney, which was uncontradicted. There was no formal affidavit of merits. The motion was one addressed to the discretion of tlie trial court, and its decision thereon will not be reversed, unless it appears from the record that there was a clear abuse of such discretion. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People's Ice Co. v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. McMurran v. BourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Nye v. SwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Sheldon v. RisedorphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Gillette-Herzog Manufacturing Co. v. AshtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. O'BRIEN v. KemperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Fishstrom v. Bankers Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. McClure v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Clifford v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API