Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeals by defendant from orders of the district court for Pine county, Crosby, J., denying a motion to relieve the defendant from default and vacating and setting aside the order for judgment and denying a motion to vacate and set aside the decision and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
The first of'the two appeals taken in this case was from an order of the trial court denying the motion of the defendant and appellant for an order relieving it from default, and setting aside the order for judgment for plaintiff and respondent against the defendant. The order was appealable. It is true that the merits of a nonappealable order made by a district court cannot be reviewed in this court by *273means of an appeal from an order vacating and setting aside or refusing so to do (Brown v. Minnesota T. M. Co., 44 Minn. 322, 46 N. W. 560; Lockwood v. Bock, 46 Minn. 73, 48 N. W. 458), and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stewart v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- County of Chicago v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Tierney v. DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Marsh v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Citizens' National Bank v. BrandenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Rodgers v. United States & Dominion Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.