Legal Opinion

Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1929No. J-670PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSinnott, Judge

This matter comes before us on demurrer to the petition, on the ground, first, that it does not state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims, and second, that all sums paid prior to December 5, 1922, are barred by the statute of limitations.

Plaintiff seeks to recover $14,995 paid for rentals of land situated within a national forest, all of which said sum, with the exception of $1,845, was paid to defendant prior to the calendar year 1923.

*603It is alleged in paragraph 2 of the petition:

“2. Prior to May 14, 1896, the plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Big Cottonwood…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Utah Light & Traction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913
  4. Maginnis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Austin Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  5. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API