Legal Opinion

King v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 14, 1913No. 32013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The Reporter's statement of the case: The allegations of the petition appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBarNey, J.

The question for decision in this case arises upon the demurrer of the defendants to the plaintiff’s second amended petition. The facts set out in the petition are substantially as follows:

The plaintiff, who is a citizen of the United States, on the 6th day of April, 1891, purchased from the United States at the United States land office at Helena, Mont., a tract of public land containing 160 acres, and for which he was com*373pellecl to pay $2.50 per acre, but that the price fixed therefor by law was only $1.25 per acre, in consequence of which he was compelled to pay $200 in excess of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Medbury v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Ach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  5. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API