Legal Opinion

United States v. Laughlin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 14, 1919No. 200PublishedCited by 30 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

This case, although involving but two hundred dollars, is deemed by the Government to be important because typical of a large group of cases of like character. Suit was brought by Laughlin in the Court of Claims under § 2 of the Act of March 26, 1908, c. 102, 35 Stat. 48, for the repayment of an alleged excess charge exacted of him when he made a preemption cash entry November 20, 1878, for a tract of 160 acres of public land, part of Section 33, Township 5 South, Range 12 East, W. M., in the Dalles, Oregon, land district, for which he was charged by the proper officer of the United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. McLean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Medbury v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Amoco Production Company v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of Department of the Interior, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. The Joclin Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Aycock-Lindsey Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API