Legal Opinion

Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 11, 1963No. 377-60PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

The plaintiff is the widow and executrix of Dr. Joseph Friedman who served in the Army on active duty as a medical officer from January 9, 1941, to January 30, 1947. She sues for disability retirement pay alleged to have been arbitrarily denied her husband.

During his service Dr. Friedman suffered a number of periods of serious illness and underwent considerable hospitalization. In 1944-1946 he had a series of boards to canvass his capacity for continued service, the last of which was a Retiring Board at Walter Reed General Hospital which decided on October 25, 1946, that he was…

2Cases cited129 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Blake v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Entines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Harold Grubin v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Reidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API