Legal Opinion

Hopi Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 27, 2002No. 97-301LPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Senior Judge.

This action arises out of the Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act of 1974, 88 Stat. 1712, Pub.L. No. 93-531, 25 U.S.C. § 640d, et seq., (1974) (“Settlement Act”), which authorized court action between the Hopi Tribe and the Navajo Nation to partition a reservation created by Congress in 1934. Plaintiff, the Hopi Tribe, contends that defendant’s failure to reimburse all of its Settlement Act legal fees and expenses gives rise to a monetary claim under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1), based upon the asserted money mandating nature of § 640d-7(e) or on the basis of a…

2Cases cited118 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Contreras v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API