Legal Opinion

LeNeau v. Nessett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1972No. 42739PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

The issue of this case when it was tried in the district court was whether an implied easement for a septic tank drain field had been created on defendants’ land. The court ruled in the affirmative, and defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. We affirm.

The property involved is Lots 9 to 19, Block 18, Ironton First Division, St. Louis County. Franklin Lundberg bought lots 9 to 12 in 1948 and lots 13 to 19 the next year. In 1948 he built a house on lots 10 to 12 and a septic tank was placed on lot 12 to the east of the house…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. State v. E. A. H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Vasatka v. MatschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Galaxy ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Niehaus v. City of LitchfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API