LeNeau v. Nessett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
The issue of this case when it was tried in the district court was whether an implied easement for a septic tank drain field had been created on defendants’ land. The court ruled in the affirmative, and defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. We affirm.
The property involved is Lots 9 to 19, Block 18, Ironton First Division, St. Louis County. Franklin Lundberg bought lots 9 to 12 in 1948 and lots 13 to 19 the next year. In 1948 he built a house on lots 10 to 12 and a septic tank was placed on lot 12 to the east of the house…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. E. A. H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Vasatka v. MatschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Galaxy ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Niehaus v. City of LitchfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995