Legal Opinion

Olson v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1955No. 36,411PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

For a determination of this appeal the essential facts may be stated as follows:

On March 28,1925, one Percy F. Kearney was the owner of lots 1 and 2 of block 2, Wooddale Heights in Hennepin county. In order to more easily understand the facts stated herein, it may be assumed that these lots run in an easterly and westerly direction, lot 1 lying immediately to the north of lot 2. The lots are bounded on the east by Oakdale avenue. There is no alley on the west side of lot 2. Lot 1 is bounded on the north by Morningside Road.

On March 28, 1925, Kearney conveyed lot 2 to one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wiesel v. SmiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
  2. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sime v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Pioneer Mining Co. v. Bannack Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API