Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. City of Litchfield

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1995No. C5-94-2188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

529 N.W.2d 410 (1995)

Erv T. NIEHAUS, Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF LITCHFIELD, defendant and counter-claimant, Respondent,

v.

Erv T. NIEHAUS, Counter-Defendant, Appellant.

No. C5-94-2188.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 28, 1995.

Ronald R. Frauenshuh, Sr., Frauenshuh & Spooner, Paynesville, for appellant.

David G. Berry, Olson, Nelson, Drange & Wood, Litchfield, for respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and PARKER and FOLEY,[*] JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

A purchaser of land appeals the trial court's decision that the City of Litchfield obtained an easement by necessity over his property.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Clark v. Galaxy ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Nunnelee v. SchunaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. LeNeau v. NessettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Magnuson v. CossetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Victor Legatt v. Dennis LegattCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API