Legal Opinion
State v. E. A. H.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1956No. 36,547PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is a paternity proceeding instituted against the defendant, E. A. H., by the county attorney of Hennepin County under M. S. A. 257.19 upon the complaint of Mrs. Elnora Newman, as mother and natural guardian of her child, who is alleged to be the daughter of the defendant. A jury was waived and upon trial to the court the defendant was found not guilty. The state moved for a new trial on the ground that the findings of the court were not justified by the evidence. From an order denying this motion, the complainant, Mrs. Newman, appeals.
This controversy involves the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Phillips v. State Ex Rel. HathcockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. HunterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Richards v. ReiterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Bill by and Through Bill v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Curry v. FelixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.