Vasatka v. Matsch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought actions against defendants for damages arising out of an automobile collision. The cases were consolidated for trial, the jury returning verdicts for defendants. Subsequently, plaintiffs’ motions for new trials were denied. Judgments were entered, following which plaintiffs, with the court’s consent, moved to vacate the same and for new trials on the ground, among others, of newly discovered evidence. The court thereupon ordered the judgments vacated and granted plaintiffs new trials. From such orders these appeals are taken.
The facts are as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Smith v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Satanta State Bank v. O. B. McClintock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schleuder v. SoltowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Brown v. BertrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Leraan v. Aftenro SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.