Legal Opinion

Romanchuk v. Plotkin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1943No. 33,441PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

In 1915 defendants acquired the real property at the northeast corner of Twelfth avenue north and Humboldt avenue north in Minneapolis, on which there was a duplex dwelling near the corner facing Twelfth avenue, known as 1312 Twelfth avenue north, and a small dwelling toward the rear facing Humboldt, known as 1206 Humboldt avenue north. Both houses were equipped with plumbing serviced by a common sewer drain which connected with the public sewer in Humboldt avenue.

On February 23, 1921, defendants acquired the real property now owned by plaintiffs, located immediately east of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Wiesel v. SmiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
  5. Winston v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Westbrook v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API