Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 1980No. 7910SC1111PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

At the outset we note that defendants failed to plead affirmatively in their answer the defenses of failure of consideration and the statute of frauds as required by N. C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 8(c), and they thereby waive their right to assert these defenses. Yeager v. Dobbins, 252 N.C. 824, 114 S.E. 2d 820 (1960); Grissett v. Ward, 10 N.C. App. 685, 179 S.E. 2d 867 (1971). Although not wholly determinative, it is significant that defendants made no motion to amend their pleadings and plaintiffs had no notice that such a defense would be raised. Grissett v. Ward, supra; Young…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Gurganus v. HedgepethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Mulberry-Fairplains Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of North WilkesboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Arnette v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Parrish Funeral Home, Inc. v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API