Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Horrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1968No. 542PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The form of action alleged in the complaint determines whether a cause is local or transitory. Blevens v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 144, 176 S.E. 262. Plaintiff’s action is to recover monetary damages for the breach of a contract to construct a house. Its purpose is not to recover real property, not to determine an estate or interest in land, and not to recover for damages to realty. It is not, therefore, a local action within the meaning of G.S. 1-76(1), and defendant is not entitled to have the cause removed to Carteret County as a matter of right. Casstevens v. Membership Corp., 254 N.C. 746,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Casstevens v. Wilkes Telephone Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Blevens v. Kitchin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. White v. . RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Snow v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Godley Const. Co., Inc. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Gurganus v. HedgepethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. McCrary Stone Service, Inc. v. LyallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Wise v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API