Legal Opinion

Boyce v. McMahan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1974No. 50PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Generally when parties not under disability contract at arms’ length on a lawful subject, the courts will give redress to the injured party for a wrongful breach. On certain subjects and under certain conditions,’ contracts are required to be in writing. Others are valid if in parol. However, in either event the contracting parties must have agreed on all material terms of the contract.

To constitute a valid contract, the parties “must assent to the same thing in the same sense, and their minds must meet as to all the terms. If any portion of the proposed terms is not settled,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Kirby v. Stokes County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Goeckel v. StokelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Sprinkle v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. White Sands Group, LLC v. PRS II, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Chappell v. RothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Miller v. RoseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC v. County of CabarrusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API