Gurganus v. Hedgepeth
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
G.S. 1-76(1) provides that where an action is for “[recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form of such right or interest,” the action must be tried in the county in which the property is situated. In Sample v. Towe Motor Company, Inc., 23 N.C. App. 742, 209 S.E. 2d 524 (1974), we found that this statute applied to facts much the same as those now before us. There, plaintiff lessors, alleging that defendant had breached the lease, notified defendant to vacate the premises and asked the court to order the lease terminated.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Sample v. Towe Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Wise v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. McConnaugheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Snow v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. CasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Pierce v. Associated Rest & Nursing Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Smith v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.