Legal Opinion

Gurganus v. Hedgepeth

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 792SC1026PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

G.S. 1-76(1) provides that where an action is for “[recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form of such right or interest,” the action must be tried in the county in which the property is situated. In Sample v. Towe Motor Company, Inc., 23 N.C. App. 742, 209 S.E. 2d 524 (1974), we found that this statute applied to facts much the same as those now before us. There, plaintiff lessors, alleging that defendant had breached the lease, notified defendant to vacate the premises and asked the court to order the lease terminated.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Sample v. Towe Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Wise v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McConnaugheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Snow v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. CasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Pierce v. Associated Rest & Nursing Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Smith v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API