Legal Opinion

Elks v. . Insurance Co

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1912PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract to lend the plaintiff $1,000.

The plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove that he held a life policy in the defendant company, and that in 1910 he applied to the defendant to lend him $1,000; that he told J. F. Stokes, an agent of the defendant, who had authority to solicit insurance and to collect premiums, but no authority to make loans or take applications therefor, that he wanted some money, and that Stokes said he could get some; that most of the correspondence in reference to the loans was between the said Stokes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. McCaw Manufacturing Co. v. Felder & RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Beaupré v. Pacific & Atlantic Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  4. Rankin v. Mitchem.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Tanning Co. v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API