Legal Opinion

Mulberry-Fairplains Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of North Wilkesboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1992No. 9123SC38PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

I

The sole issue presented by defendant’s appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment.

Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show [1] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and [2] that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) (1990). Appellate review of summary judgment cases focuses on “whether the trial court’s conclusions as to these questions of law…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Zepp v. Mayor & Council of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walton v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. GAF CORPORATION v. Tolar Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  4. Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. CLM EQUIP. COMPANY, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
  5. Jones v. Town of AngierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API