Legal Opinion

Parrish Funeral Home, Inc. v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1991No. 9011DC1200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict in defendants’ favor. For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court erred and reverse its judgment of 10 May 1990.

Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 50, the question presented by a motion for a directed verdict to both the trial and appellate courts is whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, is sufficient to reach the jury. Helvy v. Sweat, 58 N.C. App. 197, 199, 292 S.E.2d 733, 734, disc. review denied, 306 N.C. 741, 295 S.E.2d 477 (1982) (citation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Abernethy v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Shields v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Mason v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Whittington v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muse v. Charter Hospital of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Muse v. Charter Hospital of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Zagaroli v. NeillNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API