Legal Opinion

Lande v. Southern California Freight Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1947No. Civ. 15227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in a court trial against Southern California Freight Lines, and the defendant gave notice of appeal. In due time defendant served and filed a notice stating that it desired to set forth the oral proceedings by a settled statement, in lieu of reporter’s transcript, under rule 7 (a) of Rules on Appeal. Defendant caused to be prepared a partial transcript of the testimony and served and filed a condensed statement in narrative form of portions of the oral proceedings and also stated the points to be raised on appeal. These points were twenty-one in number, thirteen…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Callahan v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Hixson v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Keller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Embree Uranium Co. v. LiebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. McCord Co. v. PlotnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API