Legal Opinion
Keller v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1950No. Civ. 17953PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
The petitioner in this original proceeding seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to settle a statement on appeal under rule 7, Judicial Council Rules on Appeal.
Petitioner, while doing business under the name of Keller Manufacturing Company, was plaintiff in an action commenced in respondent court, numbered 545497, and was defendant in another action in the same court, numbered SFC-75. Respondents Ravenscroft and Hiers were the respective adverse parties in the foregoing actions. The two actions were consolidated for trial and trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Burns v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- St. George v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dainty Pretzel Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. GzikowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Western States Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.