Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1956No. Civ. 21740PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
In this original proceeding petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to settle a statement on appeal under rule 7, Judicial Council Rules on Appeal.
The petitioners were plaintiffs in an action brought against one Omansky to recover damages for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations made by Omansky in the sale of an apartment house. Findings were made and judgment entered in favor of defendants.
Following rendition of judgment and denial of their motion for a new trial, petitioners herein duly and regularly filed notice of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Burns v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Sansome v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Western States Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- St. George v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
- Sidebotham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Herick v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.