Legal Opinion

McCord Co. v. Plotnick

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1951No. Civ. 18508PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendants from which they appealed. (See Civ. No. 18390.) They made a motion in the trial court that the reporter’s transcript be amended by striking certain words from an answer of a witness and inserting other words in lieu thereof. After a hearing at which the court reporter testified that the transcript is in accord with his shorthand notes the motion was denied. Defendants have appealed from the order.

Plaintiff has moved to dismiss the latter appeal on the ground that it is not a “special order made after final judgment,” referred to in subdivision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Carradine v. CarradineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Spear v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Harmon v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API