Hyde v. Boyle
California Supreme Court
Motion for an order of the Supreme Court correcting and striking out parts of a transcript on appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edward F. Fitzpatrick, for Appellants. T. M. Osmont, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— The appellants ask to have struck out of the printed transcript filed herein a portion of the bill of exceptions that had been settled and certified by the judge of the superior court, prior to the filing of the transcript, upon the ground “ that no part of the said matter was read, referred to, or submitted to the court below upon the hearing of the motion upon which the *591order appealed from was made and entered”; and have presented certain affidavits in support of their motion, and of the grounds upon which it is made.
We think that the subject-matter of this motion was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Vance v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by17 opinions
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- McCarty v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bedan v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Harden v. CardWyoming Supreme Court · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.