Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Harm

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1929No. Docket No. 6599PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This is an action for personal injuries. The cause was tried with a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants F. M. Hodge, John Kwis and H. S. Rose, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of San Joaquin Valley Transportation Company, and against the defendant W. B. Lott in the sum of $4,500. The jury also returned a verdict in favor of the defendant George Plarm. The transportation Company made a motion for a nonsuit, which was denied. It also .made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Murray v. . DwightNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lee Moor Contracting Co. v. BlantonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Harris v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Simmons v. Santa Barbara Ice and Cold Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API