Legal Opinion
In Re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2005No. 04 CIV 1144 (JGK)PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS
The plaintiffs bring this action under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l et seq. (the “ICA”), New York General Business Law § 349 (“N.Y.Gen.Bus.L. § 349”), and under state common law for unjust enrichment and for breach of fiduciary duty. The plaintiffs bring these claims against nominal defendants the Eaton Vance Funds, and against defendants Eaton Vance, its wholly owned subsidiary Eaton Vance, Inc. (“EV”), and Lloyd George Management (B.V.I.) Limited (“LGML”). The plaintiffs also bring these…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Marshall v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Eaves v. Designs for Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Porrazzo v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Schwartzco Enterprises LLC v. TMH Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.