Porrazzo v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (Doc. 19), and Defendants’ unopposed Motion for Judicial Notice, (Doc. 22). For the reasons stated below Defendants’ Motion for Judicial Notice is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
The following facts are assumed to be true for purposes of the motion.
Plaintiff Lee Porrazzo consumed approximately ten six-ounce cans of tuna fish per week…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Cuoco v. MoritsuguCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Koenig v. Boulder Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Daniel v. Mondelez Int'l, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.