Legal Opinion
Eaves v. Designs for Finance, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2011No. 09-cv-3952 (CS)PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. (Docs. 53, 56, 59.)
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
For the purposes of the instant motions, the Court assumes the facts, although not the legal conclusions, in the Second Amended Complaint to be true. Plaintiff Leland Eaves is a Colorado resident and the owner of Plaintiff Cando Consultant Services, Inc. (“Cando”), a Florida-based construction services company. (SAC ¶¶ 89.) 1 Plaintiffs allege that in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Defendants Designs for Finance, Inc.…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Cuoco v. MoritsuguCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Rahman v. SchriroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Petedge, Inc. v. GargDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Schwartzco Enterprises LLC v. TMH Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.