Legal Opinion
Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2013No. 11-CV-5331PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Verified Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 26.) For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. Background
For the purposes of the present Motion, the Court accepts as true the facts (but not the conclusions) stated in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Verified Complaint (“SAC”), (Doc. 17).
A. Factual Background
1. The Parties
Plaintiff Transeo S.A.R.L. (“Transeo”) is a French limited liability company with its…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cuoco v. MoritsuguCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- U.S. Small Bus. Admin. Funding Corp. v. FeinsodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Spizz v. Eluz (In re Ampal-American Israel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- 100 Orchard Street, LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- 100 Orchard Street, LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lifsa Drugs, LLC et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.