Legal Opinion

Springfield Lumber, Feed & Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1960PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

We are here concerned with the troublesome question of a so-called “loaned employee.”

The issue before the commission was whether Vernon K. Schinke at the time he incurred his injury continued to be *409the employee of his original employer, the dairy company, or had become the employee of the special employer, the lumber company. The commission determined that he had become the employee of the special employer, and the appellants challenge such holding.

The essential tests to be applied in determining whether a loaned employee retains his employment with his original employer, or becomes the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Braun v. JewettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Wagner v. LarsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DePratt v. SergioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Meka v. Falk Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Huckstorf v. Vince L. Schneider EnterprisesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hoyle Green, Individually and as Guardian of Takuye Green, Incompetent v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. William Signorini, Patricia McNabb James Zischler, Dr. Derward Lepley, Dr. Robert Flemma, Cardiovascular Surgery Associates, S.C. And St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Skornia v. Highway Pavers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API