Legal Opinion

Braun v. Jewett

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1957PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

Braun’s Appeal.

1. The controlling question on this appeal is whether it can be said as a matter of law that Braun, by helping the J & W crew unload the radiator, became an employee of J & W so as to become entitled to workmen’s compensation from J & W for the injuries he received. In a carefully reasoned decision the circuit court answered that question in the affirmative, and accordingly dismissed the complaint, since the Workmen’s Compensation Act provides that the remedy thereby given shall be exclusive as against the employer. Sec. 102.03 (2), Stats. 1949. While the question is a close…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wittke v. State Ex Rel. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bank of Commerce v. PAINE, WEBBER, J. & C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Meka v. Falk Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API