Legal Opinion

Huckstorf v. Vince L. Schneider Enterprises

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1968No. 15PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issues are: (1) Can the issue of a loaned employee be resolved by motion for summary judgment; and (2) was the crane operator a loaned or special employee of the general contractor.

The rule so often repeated it needs no citation is that if it appears there are any disputed facts material to the controlling legal issue or any permissible conflicting inferences from the undisputed facts material to the issue the matter should not be determined by summary judgment. In this case, if it is determined that Zaretzke was the loaned or special employee of Woerfel and conversely not the employee of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cayll v. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Braun v. JewettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Springfield Lumber, Feed & Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Freeman v. Krause Milling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. DePratt v. SergioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Meka v. Falk Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Olston v. HallockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API