Legal Opinion

Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1931PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

No question is raised as to the right of Tiskewicz to compensation in the sum found by the commission. The only question involved in this appeal is whether compensation for Tiskewicz’s injuries shall be paid by Seaman Body Corporation or by Charles Abresch & Company, — the question of responsibility depending on which of the two companies was the employer of the injured man at the time of the accident. The commission found that, at the time of the injury, the applicant “was not an employee of Charles Abresch & Company” but was “in the employ of the Seaman Body Corporation,” and made an award…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cayll v. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Spodick v. Nash Motors Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Visiting Nurse Ass'n v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Stuyvesant Corp. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Hoover v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  5. Berrier v. Associated Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API