Legal Opinion
Van Roy v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1958PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCuRRiE, J.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether the accident arose out of the employment within the meaning of sec. 102.03 (1) (e), Stats.
The requirement that an accident must arise out of the employment in order to be compensable is common to most workmen’s compensation statutes. In fact, the Workmen’s Compensation Acts of 41 states and the Federal Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 USCA, sec. 901 et seq., contain such requirement. 1 Larson, Law of Workmen’s Compensation, p. 41, sec. 6.10. The Colorado court in the case of University of Denver v. Nemeth (1953), 127 Colo.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- University of Denver v. NemethSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pabst v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Whitehurst v. Rainbo Baking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.