Legal Opinion

DePratt v. Sergio

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1981No. 79-1243PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

The issue presented on review is whether we should discard the borrowed servant rule in favor of the dual liability approach. We decline to discard the borrowed servant rule.

This controversy arose when plaintiff, Kenneth De-Pratt, an employee of Metal Buildings of Wisconsin, Inc., a contracting business, sustained injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of a crane operator who was employed by and operating a crane belonging to Sergio Crane Service. Plaintiff was entitled to worker’s compensation benefits from Metal Buildings and sued Sergio Crane in a tort action for damages. Sergio Crane…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Arsand v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Freeman v. Krause Milling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. DePratt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Meka v. Falk Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API