Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Chandler
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1942No. Civ. 3006PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This action involves an injury occurring to plaintiff and respondent occasioned as a result of a collision between a Chevrolet coupé and a Chevrolet truck (a type).
The testimony of respondent Bennett shows that on 18, 1939, he left San Francisco for Madera with one Donahue, in Donahue’s car, at about 5 o’clock p. m., to visit Donahue’s wife who lived in that city. Originally Donahue was driving the car. Bennett later drove. As they left Donahue drove due to the fact that he was more familiar with that particular road. According to his testimony he, Bennett, sat beside Donahue and due to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barsha v. Metro-Goldwyn-MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Chichester v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Mayfield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- De Arellanes v. ArellanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Huetter v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mathers v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gluckstein v. LipsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Kroplin v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cottle v. GibbonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.