Legal Opinion
Gluckstein v. Lipsett
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1949No. Civ. No 13934PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In a malpractice action, plaintiff recovered a judgment entered upon a jury verdict, against defendant Phillip J. Lipsett, in the sum of $115,000, from which judgment defendant appealed.
Contentions
1. Evidence is insufficient to justify the finding of malpractice. 2. Evidence is insufficient to sustain the amount of the verdict. 3. Error of court in permitting plaintiff to read from a medical textbook. 4. Alleged misconduct of counsel for plaintiff and one of his witnesses. 5. Error in refusing three proposed instructions.
1. Evidence Sufficient to Prove Malpractice
In view of the many times the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Feldstein v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.