Huetter v. Andrews
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment.
The action is for damages resulting from an automobile collision. There appears to be no dispute as to the facts. Appellant’s brief recites that, “On March 10th, 1946, the plaintiff, Mary B. Huetter, accompanied her son, Stephen Huetter and his wife, Theresa B. Huetter, for a ride to Palm Springs in his Chevrolet automobile, which we shall refer to as the Huetter ear. The plaintiff rode in the rear seat; her son and his wife occupied the front seat. The parties traveled eastbound along Highway 99. This highway, east of Banning, in the vicinity of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loftus v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Berlin v. ViolettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bennett v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Traylen v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Holibaugh v. ItoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by39 opinions
- Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Downing v. Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hudson v. RainvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ribble v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.