Legal Opinion

Austin v. Newton

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1920No. Civ. No. 3050PublishedCited by 28 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while riding on a motorcycle, driven by his son, on Citrus Avenue, near the town of Covina, in Los Angeles County. Plaintiff recovered judgment. Defendant appeals, contending that plaintiff’s version of the accident, as described by himself and his witnesses, is so irreconcilable with the admitted physical facts that it is inherently impossible that plaintiff could have been injured in the manner that he and his witnesses described.

Citrus Avenue runs northerly and southerly. It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stokes v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Quigley v. NaughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Neilson v. HouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bramble v. McEwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Marston v. Pickwick Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API