Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1936No. Civ. 1198PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiff, as beneficiary in a policy of accident insurance issued by defendant, instituted this action to recover the amount specified in the policy for the accidental death of the insured. The trial of the issues which were raised by the pleadings of the parties was had before the court and a jury selected for the purpose and resulted in the return of a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for the amount-demanded. Judgment in plaintiff’s favor was thereafter duly rendered. From the judgment thus entered the defendant has prosecuted the present appeal.

Numerous specifications of error which are…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Davilla v. Liberty Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Squier v. Davis Standard Bread Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API