Legal Opinion

Barsha v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1939No. Civ. 12095PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

A judgment was entered against the corporation defendants in the sum of $10,000 upon the return of the verdict of a jury. The appeal is prosecuted by the corporation defendants from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for the entry of judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict. A number of individual defendants were named in the complaint but as to them the action was dismissed.

Plaintiffs wrote a motion picture scenario which they titled “High Fever”. A copy of plaintiffs’ manuscript was delivered to appellants on January 2, 1935, for the purpose of examination and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API