Barsha v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
A judgment was entered against the corporation defendants in the sum of $10,000 upon the return of the verdict of a jury. The appeal is prosecuted by the corporation defendants from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for the entry of judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict. A number of individual defendants were named in the complaint but as to them the action was dismissed.
Plaintiffs wrote a motion picture scenario which they titled “High Fever”. A copy of plaintiffs’ manuscript was delivered to appellants on January 2, 1935, for the purpose of examination and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.