Cottle v. Gibbon

Basically, the issues on this appeal relate solely to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the trial court in favor of the defendant, the respondent herein. The plaintiff, who is the appellant herein, contends to the contrary, claiming that the judgment against him is the result of a misconception of the law, but this contention is without merit.

The plaintiff and defendant are brother and sister respectively ; own adjoining ranches; and are litigating a boundary dispute arising out of such ownership. The properties in question, which are referred to as the “upper” ranch…