Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Hancock
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1959No. Civ. 23546PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.
Appeal from a judgment granting plaintiffs relief from restrictions limiting the use of their respective real properties.
Plaintiff Joseph A. Hirsch has been since September 4,1945, the owner of parts of Lots 21 and 20 in Tract 3446 on the northeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Rossmore Avenue in Los Angeles. The property has a footage of 250 feet on Wilshire and about 147 feet on Rossmore. A single-family residence, erected more than 30 years ago, is situated on the property.
Plaintiff Madeleine B. Hirsch has been since October 9, 1946, the owner of parts of the same lots in the same…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Wolff v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steve Vogli & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Western Land Co. v. TruskolaskiNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- County of Butte v. BachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mason v. FarmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Paschen v. PashkowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.