Steve Vogli & Co. v. Lane
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCK ARD, Commissioner.
Plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment entered in his suit to determine the validity of a purported amendment to restrictions on its land. The stipulated difference in value of the land brought about by the continuance or modification of the restrictions exceeds our minimum jurisdictional amount. See Eilers v. Alewel, Mo., 393 S.W.2d 584.
Broadview Heights consists of two separate but adjoining subdivisions of land in Kansas City, Missouri, containing a total of 35 lots. Plaintiff is the owner of lots numbered 75 through 80. The other 29, through a division of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Quinn v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Farmer v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Hopkins v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Pierce v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Mathews Real Estate Co. v. National Printing & Engraving Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Blackburn v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kauffman v. RolingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hall v. American Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Weber v. Les Petite AcademiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bumm v. Olde Ivy Development, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.