McCarthy v. City of Manhattan Beach
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiffs sought a judgment declaring that a certain zoning ordinance restricting the use of their oceanfront property to beach recreational purposes is “null and void” as applied to them. In the first cause of action they challenged the constitutionality of the zoning restriction insofar as it affects their land, claiming that it violates the due process and equal protection clauses of both the federal and state Constitutions and results in a taking of their property for public use without compensation. (U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. XIV; §1; Cal. Const. art. I, §13.) They also alleged that the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.